Monday, September 12, 2005

Pay raise furor on the right

Rep. Mark Cohen has expressed concern that, while some progressive organizations have condemned the legislative pay-raise and attempted to use it as leverage for liberal ends (e.g., a hike in the minimum wage), the majority of the outrage has come from the right, where it has an anti-government flavor (and thus quite different goals). The Sunday Inquirer pursues that angle in a story positing a civil war within the state GOP with the grassroots taking exception to the move and the leadership defending it.
And at a meeting yesterday of the Republican State Committee, members passed a resolution knocking the GOP-controlled legislature and Democrat Gov. Rendell for the pay hike - a move that pollster Michael Young, a longtime observer of state politics, called "extraordinary."
In fact, conservative talk radio hosts and groups like the Young Republicans appear to be planning to punish some members of their party in upcoming primaries, perhaps finding Toomey-like super-conservatives to run against raise supporters. An interesting historical analysis of state conservative groups and trends can be found here.

5 Comments:

Blogger Dumplingeater said...

So, is the point that in-fighting among Repugs is a good thing, or that joining hands with extreme right-wing elements of the Repugs will strenghten their power base and negatively affect progressive causes? Or both, or neither?

5:57 PM  
Blogger ACM said...

I don't know that I was attempting to argue any "point" when I posted this, but for my take, I'd say I started with the "in-fighting must be good" viewpoint but am now wondering whether I want more conservative moderates under attack by extremists on the right (although I don't necessarily mind moderate liberals being given a run for their money from the left, so I suppose I shouldn't be too unsympathetic to where they're coming from).

I don't know that progressives are really joining hands with the right, to my mind, but I could imagine that increasing the general outrage noise strengthens the grassroots folks in their internicine wars, at least. grist for the thought mill...

6:02 PM  
Blogger ACM said...

Of course,joining hands with extreme right-wing elements of the Republicans strengthens their power base and negatively affects progresses causes.

Let me just say that I have *no* interest in "joining hands with" the right. However, that doesn't mean that I'm willing to let their interest in a topic keep me from working on my own interests in that same arena. It will be very rare that the ends will coincide, even if the sparking point is the same, as is clear from the current raise-the-minimum-wage (versus "oust the bastards") response to the legislative pay hike.

I think that you are presuming a coalition where none exists, in either intent or perception (yourself excluded). You have yet to convince me otherwise, or, as far as I can tell, really to address that question at all.

4:45 PM  
Blogger Dumplingeater said...

Wow! Quite a lot to read carefully, and I don't have the time now - but I'll come back later. For now, I just want to clarify that I wasn't presuming that you were making a point -- my question was just musing on the keyboard. And yeah, "joining hands" might have been sretching things a bit, but there is a larger philosophical issue here that I'm still struggling with.

10:27 PM  
Blogger ACM said...

I also believe that the desire to find progressive "interests" in legislature-bashing at a time when other issues--the John Roberts nomination, the war in Iraq, the allowing a predominantly black city that plays a decisive role in the election of statewide officials in Louisiana to be destroyed as a result of federal budget cuts, to cite the three most important examples--are far more important and far more consistent with progressive values as traditionally understood, casts a cloud upon the future of progressive politics in Philadelphia.

Am I to take this little lecture, which suggests that local organizations should have deferred to national issues and crises most of which didn't yet exist when we were discussing the pay-raise topic, as an example of bridge-building with allies? Just askin', caus' the effect it has on me is not quite that. [One gets the feeling that you also didn't recognize the tone of the original post as a hat-tip to your arguments.]

Most of my life I have been concerned in the political arena *only* with national issues, but I'm attempting to change that. To suggest that, say, tracking the action of local politicians and attempting to exert pressure on them detracts from anyone's ability to also oppose the Iraq war (which I've personally been doing since 9/12/01) or to participate in humanitarian efforts is at best ludicrous and at worst defeatist of any attempt to convince people that regional activism matters. Surely you are capable of pursuing more than one priority at at time, and likewise with other groups and individuals.

eesh.

10:08 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home